Parkland High School Student Posts Odd Picture Which Shows 'Plan For Gun Control' Written By
In a late afternoon tweet on Sunday, shooting survivor David Hogg posted the following:
Thank you Livingston NJ you guys rock and Thank you Chuck Rettig for sharing your opinion and plan we need people like you making their voices heard!
In the lower right corner of the picture, you can see a document which was allegedly written by Chuck Rettig, a lawyer who lives in Beverly Hills, California and works for Hochman, Salkin, Rettig, Toscher & Perez, PC.
Here is the document enlarged:
Transcript:
My plan for gun control.
The only guns allowed for home ownership should be a pistol (revolver) or shotgun. Hunting rifle may be owned but the types of allowable sights prohibited. (Nothing that will allow a shooter to be further away than the cop can focus on). When going on a hunt, it must be registered with local authorities. System to be determined.
No guns to be sold or owned that have magazine of any type. Only single fire, non-convertible weapons allowed.
Any other weapon that a person wants to own that is currently legal may still be owned but must be kept at a secure firing range. Gun cannot be checked out but a procedure for safe transport or sale of the weapon would be devised.
Practice shooting outside of a range is prohibited.
Private production of bullets is prohibited.
A gun owner can have a onetime life supply of a small number of bullets to bring home. All other bullets must be bought at the range (price issues to be worked out) and used at the range. Must turn in your shells. If more bullets are desired by owner, missing bullets need to be explained.
Gun owners must have a license after passing a test and must carry insurance. Owner must do recertification periodically.
Carry permit issued to any owner that passes all of the above but only weapon that can be carried is a pistol with no more than 4" barrel. No concealed carry, the gun must be open carried with some form of identifying badge like a cop has.
If he did actually write this, perhaps Mr. Rettig should read the Second Amendment again, which is straightforward and to the point:
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. (source)
With an estimated 300+ million firearms already in circulation in the United States, any form of ADDITIONAL gun control will most likely NOT stop future shootings from happening.
If the gun grabbers got their way and imposed even more strict gun measures - and shootings STILL occurred - we predict they'll next go for GUN CONFISCATION which will most likely lead to an internal, violent conflict as America was born out of violence and bloodshed due to an oppressive government (England) that relentlessly pushed for increasingly limited personal liberty. Ironically enough, the left is using the same tactics to advocate for not just gun control, but freedom of speech censorship (i.e. hate speech).
Remember, the Second Amendment was created for a very good purpose: to provide a way for citizens to protect themselves from a power-hungry government that crosses the line.
